Re: [tuner23] 2.3 MAF PCM's Supported by PCMX

["Mark Proctor" <maproctor@houston.rr.com>]

How about do a MAF conversion on a P-Series EEC.  Come on, guys, it's not
all that difficult.  Think of all the trouble you'd have to go through to
create a new, reliable .rdt file.  It's not as simple as just finding the
MAF table, Fuel table, and Spark table.  You'd absolutely have to find a way
around the #/min clips (which has been done for the P-series code), max
allowable injector size (once again, fixed for us), etc, etc.  I just don't
see the justification for all the work.  Not only that, but you'll wind up
using a processor that doesn't have knock sensor capability, BCS
manipulation strategies, and so forth.

Mark
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy Hidy" <Jeremy@in-touch.net>
To: <tuner23@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:16 AM
Subject: RE: [tuner23] 2.3 MAF PCM's Supported by PCMX


What about putting 2 MAFs side by side, physically parallel?
Run the potentiometers electrically in series?
Then adjust the tables?

Jeremy Hidy

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Anesi [mailto:brad.anesi@netiq.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:43 AM
To: 'tuner23@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [tuner23] 2.3 MAF PCM's Supported by PCMX


An interesting proposal, but not one I have the ability to deliver on.
That's gotta come from someone like Randy, Kevin, Dan, Jeff, Eric, Steve,
etc who has the ability to make sense of machine language.

At 55mm, the stock 2.3 MAF is pretty small.  I would not suggest at all that
it be used on a boosted application, except for maybe initial
proof-of-concept testing.  But assuming the MAF transfer table is exposed
(this would need to be one of the base requirements of a rdt file), it would
be a no-brainer to swap in a new table from a larger MAF along with the
larger MAF itself.

Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: William A Williams [mailto:bwmsbldr@juno.com]


     Brad, you make an interesting proposal. I have been working on the
idea
of a DPDIS head and intake manifold on the turbo bottom end with the IHI
turbocharger. A question that arises is at what flow rate is the MAF
maxed out in flow? And could you upgrade the stock N/A MAF with one of
twice the capacity without major changes?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




to unsubscribe: tuner23-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
to share a file: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuner23/files/
Yahoo! Groups Links








to unsubscribe: tuner23-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
to share a file: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuner23/files/
Yahoo! Groups Links






__________ NOD32 1.616 (20040204) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32.com




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Yahoo! Autos. Everything you need to know about buying or selling a car. FREE Quotes, 360° Tours, Research,
Blue Book, Compare Vehicles, Buy Used
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kEZsdA/bwnGAA/YiGOAA/IliolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

to unsubscribe: tuner23-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
to share a file: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/tuner23/files/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuner23/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    tuner23-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/